Every submitted article undergoes a rigorous and structured peer review process to ensure the academic quality, integrity, and transparency of the publication.
1. Submission
Authors submit articles through the journal system. The editor conducts an initial check for manuscript completeness.
2. Initial Screening (Desk Evaluation)
The editor evaluates the following:
Decision:
3. Peer Review (Double-Blind)
The article is sent to two independent reviewers via a double-blind system.
Reviewers assess:
4. Evaluation of Review Results
The editor evaluates the review results.
If the reviewers’ results are consistent: → Proceed directly to decision
If there are discrepancies: → Validation and clarification are conducted with the reviewers
5. Revision Stage
The author makes revisions based on the reviewers’ and editor’s comments. The revised article is resubmitted to the editor
Decision:
This process may continue for up to three revision cycles. This iterative cycle continues until the manuscript meets the established standards or reaches the maximum revision limit.
6. Final Decision
The editor decides:
7. Copyediting
Accepted articles will undergo:
8. Production
9. Publishing
Articles are published with complete metadata:
10. Post-Publication

Al Muhafidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir published by the Institute for Research and Community Service (LP2M) Al Multazam College of Qur'anic Sciences Kuningan, West Java.
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0