Taujih Methodology and Its Relevance in Understanding Similar Editions in the Qur'an

(Metodologi Taujih dan Relevansinya dalam Memahami Redaksi Serupa Dalam Al-Qur’an)

Authors

  • Muslich Marzuki Mahdhor Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an Al Multazam, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57163/yrereb90

Keywords:

Lexical variation, Mutasyabih al-lafdzi, Qur’anic linguistics, Qur’anic rhetoric, Taujih

Abstract

The Qur’an possesses distinctive linguistic characteristics, one of which is the phenomenon of similarly or identically worded verses (mutasyabih al-lafdzi). This phenomenon has generated diverse responses, ranging from Orientalist views that regard it as an indication of textual irregularity to Muslim scholars who understand it as part of the Qur’an’s rhetorical inimitability (i‘jaz Al-Qur’an).This study specifically aims to: 1) identify the forms of mutasyabih al-lafdzi in the Qur’an; 2) analyze the methodological principles of taujih in explaining variations among similar verses, and; 3) formulate a systematic framework of taujih principles integrated with classical tafsir and modern Qur’anic linguistics, while offering a scholarly critique of Orientalist views on Qur’anic repetition. This research employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach through a literature review of classical and contemporary tafsir works as well as specialized studies on taujih al-mutasyabih al-lafdzi. The analysis applies semantic, contextual, and rhetorical perspectives to uncover the relationship between lexical variation and the communicative purposes of the verses. The findings indicate that similarities in Qur’anic wording are not random but follow systematic and functional linguistic patterns. Each variation reflects meaningful adjustments to thematic context, pedagogical aims, and discourse structure. The novelty of this study lies in formulating a structured and integrative taujih framework that bridges classical exegetical tradition with modern linguistic theory and effectively addresses claims of textual inconsistency in the Qur’an. Thus, this study affirms the strategic role of taujih in strengthening the Qur’an’s internal coherence and deepening understanding of similarly worded verses.

References

Abidin, Ahmad Zainal. “Repetisi Bahasa Al-Qur’an dan Fungsi Pedagogisnya.” Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 6, no. 2 (2022): 115–32.

Abu Sway, Musthafa A. M. “Orientalist Readings of the Qur’an: A Critical Review.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 19, no. 2 (2017): 45–63.

Al-Akk, Abd al-Rahman. “Al-Rabt bayna al-Mutasyabih al-lafdzi wa Maqasid al-Qur’an.” Majallat Dirasat Maqasidiyyah 4, no. 1 (2021): 89–110.

Al-Biqa‘i, Ibrahim ibn ‘Umar. Nazm al-Durar fi Tanasub al-Ayat wa al-Suwar. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1995.

Al-Husayni, Ahmad ‘Abd al-Latif. “Dawabit Fahm al-Mutasyabih al-lafdzi fi al-Qur’an al-Karim.” Majallat al-Dirasat al-Qur’aniyyah 10, no. 2 (2017): 55–78.

Al-Isfahani, al-Raghib. Al-Mufradat fi Gharib al-Qur’an. Dar al-Ma‘rifah, 2004.

Al-Jawzi, Ibn. Zad al-Masir fi ‘Ilm al-Tafsir. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1992.

Al-Khatib, Muhammad Amin. “Al-Dawabit al-Manhajiyyah fi Taujih al-Ayat al-Mutasyabihah.” Majallat al-Tafsir wa ‘Ulum al-Qur’an 6, no. 1 (2019): 21–44.

Al-Qadi, Ahmad ‘Abd al-Rahman. “Al-Mutasyabih al-lafdzi wa Atharuhu fi Fahm al-Nass al-Qur’ani.” Majallat Dirasat Qur’aniyyah 12, no. 1 (2018): 33–55.

Al-Qurtubi, Abu ‘Abdillah. Al-Jami‘ li Ahkam al-Qur’an. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1996.

Al-Razi, Fakhr al-Din. Mafatih al-Ghayb. Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi, 1999.

Al-Samarra’i, Muhammad Salih. “Al-Furuq al-Lughawiyyah bayna al-Ayat al-Mutasyabihah.” Majallat Kulliyyat al-Dirasat al-Islamiyyah 9, no. 2 (2019): 201–24.

Al-Suyuti, Jalal al-Din. Al-Itqan fi ‘Ulum al-Qur’an. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2008.

Al-Tabari, Muhammad ibn Jarir. Jami‘ al-Bayan ‘an Ta’wil Ay al-Qur’an. Mu’assasat al-Risalah, 2001.

Al-Zarkashi, Badr al-Din. Al-Burhan fi ‘Ulum al-Qur’an. Dar al-Ma‘rifah, 1994.

Al-Zarqani, Muhammad ‘Abd al-‘Azim. Manahil al-‘Irfan fi ‘Ulum al-Qur’an. Maktabah al-Halabi, 1996.

At-Turki, ‘Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad. Taujih al-Musykil min Mutasyabih al-Qur’an. Dar ‘Alam al-Kutub, 1993.

Bell, Richard. Introduction to the Qur’an. Edinburgh University Press, 1953.

Fauzan, Ahmad. “Kaidah-Kaidah Taujih dalam Menafsirkan Ayat Mutasyabih Lafzi.” Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 5, no. 2 (2020): 143–62.

Gusmian, Islah. “Pengulangan Bahasa dalam Al-Qur’an: Perspektif Stilistika.” Jurnal Al-Bayan 21, no. 2 (2016): 145–62.

Hamidi, Abd al-Karim. “Manhaj al-Taujih fi Tafsir al-Mutasyabihat.” Majallat al-Tafsir wa ‘Ulum al-Qur’an 5, no. 2 (2020): 61–83.

Ibn ‘Ashur, Muhammad Tahir. Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanwir. Dar Sahnun, 1984.

Ibn Kathir, Isma‘il. Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim. Dar Tayyibah, 2000.

Islah, M. Stilistika Al-Qur’an. LKiS, 2016.

Ismail, Ali Sulaiman. safwatu al-Bayan fi mutasyabih an-Nazm fi al-Quran. Matba’ah ibadu ar-Rahman, 2016.

Ismail, S. “Makna Redundansi dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis 20, no. 1 (2019): 45–62. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2019.2001-04.

Kathir, Isma‘il Ibn. Tafsir al-Qur’an al-‘Azim. Dar Ṭayyibah, 2000.

Muhammad ibn Muhammad ibn, al-Jazari. al-Nashr fi al-Qira’at al-‘Ashr. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1998.

Muir, William. The Life of Muhammad. Smith, Elder & Co., 1877.

Qattan, Manna’ al-. Mabahits fi ʿUlum al-Qur’an. Maktabah al-Maʿarif, 2006.

Qutb, Sayyid. Fi Zilal al-Qur’an. Dar al-Shuruq, 2001.

Rohmah, Siti. “Retorika Pengulangan dalam Surah al-Rahman.” Al-Tadabbur 8, no. 1 (2023): 49–66.

Saeed, Abdullah. “Repetition and Structure in the Qur’an: Revisiting Orientalist Assumptions.” Journal of Islamic Studies 28, no. 1 (2016): 1–22.

Shihab, M. Quraish. “Koherensi Internal Al-Qur’an dan Penolakan Kontradiksi Teks.” Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an 17, no. 1 (2021): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.21009/JSQ.017.1.03.

Watt, William Montgomery. “The Form of the Qur’an.” Journal of Islamic Studies 27, no. 3 (2016): 245–60.

Wekke, Ismail Suardi. “I‘jaz Bayani dalam Pengulangan Redaksi Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 27, no. 1 (2019): 87–104.

Wekke, Ismail Suardi. “Pendekatan Taujih dalam Menjawab Kritik Orientalis terhadap Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 27, no. 2 (2019): 165–82.

Zamakhshari, Mahmud ibn ‘Umar al-. al-Kashshaf ‘an Haqa’iq Ghawamid al-Tanzil. Dar al-Kitab al-‘Arabi, 1987.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Taujih Methodology and Its Relevance in Understanding Similar Editions in the Qur’an: (Metodologi Taujih dan Relevansinya dalam Memahami Redaksi Serupa Dalam Al-Qur’an). (2026). Al Muhafidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 6(1), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.57163/yrereb90

Similar Articles

1-10 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.